<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Infeasability of Oil Shale Development in the Western U.S.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecopolitology.org/2008/08/19/the-infeasability-of-oil-shale-development-in-the-western-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecopolitology.org/2008/08/19/the-infeasability-of-oil-shale-development-in-the-western-us/</link>
	<description>The Politics of Energy and the Environment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Plan to Extract Water from Colorado River for Oil Shale Draws Fire &#124; ecopolitology</title>
		<link>http://ecopolitology.org/2008/08/19/the-infeasability-of-oil-shale-development-in-the-western-us/comment-page-1/#comment-2437</link>
		<dc:creator>Plan to Extract Water from Colorado River for Oil Shale Draws Fire &#124; ecopolitology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecopolitology.org/?p=242#comment-2437</guid>
		<description>[...] spring runoff months and pump the water into a new 1,000 acre, 15 billion gallon reservoir. But the viability of oil shale development in the west depends on water and energy &#8211; energy that would most likely be provided by new coal-fired [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] spring runoff months and pump the water into a new 1,000 acre, 15 billion gallon reservoir. But the viability of oil shale development in the west depends on water and energy &#8211; energy that would most likely be provided by new coal-fired [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shell&#8217;s Plan for Oil Shale Water Faces Stiff Opposition : Red, Green, and Blue</title>
		<link>http://ecopolitology.org/2008/08/19/the-infeasability-of-oil-shale-development-in-the-western-us/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Shell&#8217;s Plan for Oil Shale Water Faces Stiff Opposition : Red, Green, and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecopolitology.org/?p=242#comment-152</guid>
		<description>[...] spring runoff months and pump the water into a new 1,000 acre, 15 billion gallon reservoir. But the viability of oil shale development in the west depends on water and energy - energy that would most likely be provided by new coal-fired [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] spring runoff months and pump the water into a new 1,000 acre, 15 billion gallon reservoir. But the viability of oil shale development in the west depends on water and energy &#8211; energy that would most likely be provided by new coal-fired [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ecopolitology&#8217;s 10 Most Popular Posts of 2008 &#124; ecopolitology</title>
		<link>http://ecopolitology.org/2008/08/19/the-infeasability-of-oil-shale-development-in-the-western-us/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Ecopolitology&#8217;s 10 Most Popular Posts of 2008 &#124; ecopolitology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 05:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecopolitology.org/?p=242#comment-151</guid>
		<description>[...] The Infeasability of Oil Shale Development in the American West: In August I wrote: &#8220;The most persuasive argument against oil shale thus far, has been the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Infeasability of Oil Shale Development in the American West: In August I wrote: &#8220;The most persuasive argument against oil shale thus far, has been the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

