Comments on: Obama’s Unprecedented Commitment to Science

By: USB people

USB people — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:07:17 +0000

glad to hear the US is thinking about climate change and saving the planet, unfortunately here in the uk government talk about it and decide its either too expensive to fund or the british public can fund it in the middle of a recession. one of the most important things to fund, maybe obama can talk some sense into the british politicians.

By: Marco Etoro

Marco Etoro — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:19:22 +0000

He might make you proud but the other 75% of the country thinks he is bad. Do you live in under a rock or something or do you just feel like arguing tonight??

By: FloDesign Raises $42.8 Million for Jet-Inspired Wind Turbine | Earth and Industry

Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:43:47 +0000

[...] the company has also caught the eye of the Department of Energy, receiving $8.3 million from the newly-funded ARPA-E program. Considering the quantity of public and private funding pouring into FloDesign right now, I suspect [...]

By: Energy Tough Love Blog » 2009 Was A Very Busy Year For Energy Conservation - And other Environmental Endeavers

Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:32:56 +0000

[...] efficiency and renewables and a return to science-based policymaking. Many argue that Obama’s unprecedented commitment to science stands in stark contrast to the previous administration’s tampering with and dismissal of [...]

By: Chris

Chris — Fri, 29 May 2009 06:49:53 +0000

Here is a funny fact NIH is funded from the same bucket as welfare. That is why the Dems love to say we are putting more money in the science bucket. Bet none of you knew that. And there is no true science proving Global warming. Look into Richard Lindzen one of the top atmospheric physicist in the world or you can watch one movie and think you know it all.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McsZ1U20W0M&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fz8KiA-YMt8

By: Global Patriot

Global Patriot — Thu, 28 May 2009 19:59:51 +0000

It is such a relief to see this country get on track with using science to help build a better future, but the question remains – is it too little and too late – time will tell, but there is so much work that must be done to reverse the damage caused during the past eight years of neglect.

By: Chris Curran

Chris Curran — Thu, 28 May 2009 14:55:15 +0000

I agree; we should be trying to research climate change when we can spend that same money on making changes that would help curb climate change if indeed Man is affecting the climate. we dont need to wait ten years down the line to find out the Mankind is affecting the client only to find out we are ten years too late in dealing with it.

Being more efficient with our resources will reduce emissions, yes but it will also make us more secure since we would rely less on foreign energy from questionable countries. It’ll keep us safe by not having to interfere in other parts of the World because of the affect on our foreign oil supply. Less Wars of that nature and we’ll see less aggression towards the U.S. ten to twenty years down the line.