<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greenpeace Opposes Waxman-Markey Climate Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecopolitology.org/2009/06/25/greenpeace-opposes-waxman-markey-climate-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecopolitology.org/2009/06/25/greenpeace-opposes-waxman-markey-climate-bill/</link>
	<description>The Politics of Energy and the Environment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Go Green Toolshed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Breaking: Greenpeace Opposes Waxman-Markey Climate Bill</title>
		<link>http://ecopolitology.org/2009/06/25/greenpeace-opposes-waxman-markey-climate-bill/comment-page-2/#comment-3490</link>
		<dc:creator>Go Green Toolshed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Breaking: Greenpeace Opposes Waxman-Markey Climate Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 05:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecopolitology.org/?p=1071#comment-3490</guid>
		<description>[...] Breaking: Greenpeace Opposes Waxman-Markey Climate Bill [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Breaking: Greenpeace Opposes Waxman-Markey Climate Bill [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://ecopolitology.org/2009/06/25/greenpeace-opposes-waxman-markey-climate-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-3334</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 10:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecopolitology.org/?p=1071#comment-3334</guid>
		<description>James

Could you please post a link to the Greenpeace statement, press release or policy calling for &quot;the ban of every car on the road&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James</p>
<p>Could you please post a link to the Greenpeace statement, press release or policy calling for &#8220;the ban of every car on the road&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senate Climate Debate: Six to Watch on the Climb to Sixty : Red, Green, and Blue</title>
		<link>http://ecopolitology.org/2009/06/25/greenpeace-opposes-waxman-markey-climate-bill/comment-page-2/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Senate Climate Debate: Six to Watch on the Climb to Sixty : Red, Green, and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 03:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecopolitology.org/?p=1071#comment-270</guid>
		<description>[...] in late spring, critics on the left attacked the Waxman-Markey bill for compromising on carbon credits even as the right slapped on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in late spring, critics on the left attacked the Waxman-Markey bill for compromising on carbon credits even as the right slapped on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6 Reasons a Carbon Tax is Better than Cap and Trade : Red, Green, and Blue</title>
		<link>http://ecopolitology.org/2009/06/25/greenpeace-opposes-waxman-markey-climate-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>6 Reasons a Carbon Tax is Better than Cap and Trade : Red, Green, and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecopolitology.org/?p=1071#comment-262</guid>
		<description>[...] they may accept the theory of a cap-and-trade, environmental groups like  Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace bemoan Waxman-Markey for handing out permits to the biggest polluters. Even Mr. Inconvenient, Al [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they may accept the theory of a cap-and-trade, environmental groups like  Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace bemoan Waxman-Markey for handing out permits to the biggest polluters. Even Mr. Inconvenient, Al [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan</title>
		<link>http://ecopolitology.org/2009/06/25/greenpeace-opposes-waxman-markey-climate-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecopolitology.org/?p=1071#comment-263</guid>
		<description>You guys are all living a pipe dream.  It is not &quot;big industry&quot; that is being protected here, it is the consumer.  That means you and I.  What greenpeace doesn&#039;t realize is that if they get all the harsh regulations that they want, big industry will either not meet them due to unrealistic expectations or will forward the extremely high costs directly to the consumer.  Then all these half-breed greenpeace idiots will be whining and complaing about high energy costs, high food costs, high fuel costs and the rest of inflation that comes with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are all living a pipe dream.  It is not &#8220;big industry&#8221; that is being protected here, it is the consumer.  That means you and I.  What greenpeace doesn&#8217;t realize is that if they get all the harsh regulations that they want, big industry will either not meet them due to unrealistic expectations or will forward the extremely high costs directly to the consumer.  Then all these half-breed greenpeace idiots will be whining and complaing about high energy costs, high food costs, high fuel costs and the rest of inflation that comes with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joseph</title>
		<link>http://ecopolitology.org/2009/06/25/greenpeace-opposes-waxman-markey-climate-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecopolitology.org/?p=1071#comment-260</guid>
		<description>oh and a little article to read about new orleans being underwater by 2100 - http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jun/29/rising-sea-level-new-orleans</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh and a little article to read about new orleans being underwater by 2100 &#8211; <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jun/29/rising-sea-level-new-orleans" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jun/29/rising-sea-level-new-orleans</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joseph</title>
		<link>http://ecopolitology.org/2009/06/25/greenpeace-opposes-waxman-markey-climate-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecopolitology.org/?p=1071#comment-261</guid>
		<description>jesus all these comments seem so naive, why dont you look at the facts taken from real climate change scientists research and then say oh greenpeace are too harsh. Obama is just like all recent presidents of our past, putting big industry before the good of the people. Idiots don&#039;t recognize the dire position this world is in. And they never asked to ban every car on the road, goin a little overboard there aren&#039;t we? You sound like bill o&#039;rielly, stating falsity as fact that which is completely unreal to change mass opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jesus all these comments seem so naive, why dont you look at the facts taken from real climate change scientists research and then say oh greenpeace are too harsh. Obama is just like all recent presidents of our past, putting big industry before the good of the people. Idiots don&#8217;t recognize the dire position this world is in. And they never asked to ban every car on the road, goin a little overboard there aren&#8217;t we? You sound like bill o&#8217;rielly, stating falsity as fact that which is completely unreal to change mass opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

