• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Browse by Category
    • Climate Change
    • Economy
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Environmental Movement
    • Media
    • Notes
    • Politics
    • Renewable energy
    • Slideshows
    • Transportation
    • Video
You are in: Home > Climate Change > Cancún Climate Agreements at a Glance

Cancún Climate Agreements at a Glance

0 by The Guardian on December 13, 2010
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Bookmark and Share

UN COP16 climate talks in Cancun


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled "Cancún climate agreements at a glance" was written by Adam Vaughan, for guardian.co.uk on Monday 13th December 2010 16.46 UTC


Cutting carbon emissions

Scores of rich countries made pledges over the past year to cut their greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 under the Copenhagen accord but they were not incorporated in the official UN process. Cancún now formally puts those pledges into UN documentation, although they may increase or decrease in future. For the first time, developing countries also agreed to look at how they can cut emissions in the future – but did not make specific pledges.

Crucially however, none of the cuts are legally binding, and analysis suggests the pledges would lead to a 3.2C rise in temperatures – far higher than the 2C generally considered to be a level of "safe" warming.

Climate aid

A new climate green fund was agreed at Cancún to transfer money from the developed to developing world to tackle the impacts of climate change. Poorer countries saw this as a success because they will outnumber rich countries on a 'transitional committee' for the fund, which is due to be set up in 2011. But no figure was put on how much money will go into it.

Separately, ministers repeated their political promise made last year at Copenhagen to raise 0bn (£63bn) in climate aid by 2020, starting with bn (£19bn) by 2012 for "fast track" financing. This headline-grabbing promise, however, is not part of the UN process and is merely an aspiration of rich countries.

Forests

Formal backing was given for the UN's deforestation scheme, Redd (reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation), under which rich countries pay poorer nations not to chop down forests and so lock away carbon emissions. But details on when and exactly what form the scheme will take – particularly whether developed countries will be able to use it to "offset" their emissions rather than make cuts at home – are still vague.

Kyoto protocol

Decisions on the future of the Kyoto protocol, the current international treaty binding rich countries to cut emissions, were effectively deferred until South Africa next year. Whether countries will sign up for a second "commitment period" to cuts beyond 2012 remains to be seen.

In addition, decisions on the role that the protocol will play in an ultimate future legal document that binds the world's countries to emissions cuts – the "holy grail" of the UN negotiations - were delayed.

Technology transfer

The idea of transferring knowledge of clean technology between countries was backed at Cancún. A technology executive committee and a climate technology centre and network are to be set up, but there are no details on the money, where they will be based, when or by whom.

Inspections

Countries agreed to the principle of having their emissions cuts inspected. Such "monitoring, reporting and verification" will depend on the size of the country's economy, though who will carry out the inspections – the country itself, the UN or another body – was not specified.


Ads by The Guardian

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

| More

Category: Climate Change | Tags: Cancún climate change conference 2010 | COP16, Climate Change, Environment, Environmental sustainability, Global climate talks, global warming, mexico, un, united nations, World news

About the Author:

From the latest science on melting icecaps to how to organize a green funeral, the Guardian's award-winning team of green experts tells you everything you need to know about the state of the planet and what you can do to help save it

LiveOAK Media is working with The Guardian to bring our readers more excellent environmental news coverage.

Twitter Follow The Guardian on Twitter: @guardianeco
« Previous Next »

Explore LiveOak

Archives

Let’s Connect!

Featured

Animated Map of Red-Blue America

Animated Time-Lapse Map of Red-Blue America

Animated Map of Wind Power Growth

Animated Map of US Wind Power Growth

Sponsors

Radiant Heating
LiveOAK Media

Tags

2008 presdential election barack obama bp bp oil spill cap and trade carbon emissions cartoon clean energy Climate Change climate policy coal colorado congress cop-15 copenhagen Energy energy industry energy policy Environment environmental movement epa food fracking global warming humor Mean Joe Green cartoon Media natural gas obama offshore wind oil oil spill Politics pollution Renewable energy science senate social media solar Transportation Twitter Weekly Updates Video water wind energy wind power

From the Network


  • Energy and Environment News Roundup – 5.24.13
  • Energy and Environment News Roundup – 5.23.13
  • 5 Recycled Gift Card Craft Projects
  • Energy and Environment News Roundup – 5.22.13
  • Energy and Environment News Roundup – 5.21.13
  • Spotted: Repurposed Giftcard Necklace
  • Energy and Environment News Roundup – 5.17.13
  • Energy and Environment News Roundup – 5.16.13

About Ecopolitology

Ecopolitology provides up-to-date news, interviews and critical analysis of energy and environmental politics in the U.S. and around the world. Exploring a wide range of topics from policy to social movements, Ecopolitology provides an in-depth and accessible narrative about what moves sustainability in the world today.
Read More...

Part of the LiveOAK Media Network:

  • Earth & Industry →
  • greenUPGRADER →
  • Crisp Green →
  • Amazon Pilgrim →
Ecopolitolgy Header Designed by Aleksandar Rodic Part of the LiveOAK Network
© LiveOAK Media, Inc. 2010   Legal: Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.